By Isatou Sarr
National Democratic Party (NDP) leader Kebba Madi Bojang and Bojang Properties & Investment Company have been sued at the Brikama Magistrates’ Court over a land transaction involving two plots at Nema Fula Kunda.
The civil suit was filed by Sainey Ceesay and Sanna Ceesay, who are seeking the recovery of D215,000 they claim remains outstanding from payments made for the plots.
According to the plaintiffs’ particulars of claim, they entered into an agreement with the defendants in 2024 to purchase two plots for D250,000 and D265,000 respectively.
The plaintiffs claimed that they paid the full amount for the first plot and subsequently made instalment payments towards the second plot, for which they said they have receipts.
They further claimed that after completing the payments, Bojang effected Alkalo transfers of the plots in their names on 23 December 2024 and 26 June 2025.
According to the claim, the plaintiffs subsequently began construction on the plots, but their workers were later confronted by third parties who allegedly claimed ownership of the land and said the plots were subject to litigation involving Bojang.
The plaintiffs said they subsequently approached Bojang, who allegedly acknowledged the dispute and told them that he could refund their money because he could not determine when the land matter would be resolved.
They claimed that they requested a full refund but alleged that, despite assurances that they would be repaid, Bojang failed to settle the outstanding amount.
The plaintiffs said Bojang eventually refunded D300,000, leaving a balance of D215,000.
In addition to the claimed balance, the plaintiffs are seeking D100,000 in damages and D85,000 in legal and administrative costs.
They are also seeking interest at 10 percent from 2024 until the filing of the suit and 20 percent from the date of judgment until full payment, as well as any other relief the court may deem appropriate.
When the matter came before the court, the plaintiffs were present, while the defendants were absent.
Counsel T. Bayo appeared for the plaintiffs and asked the court to proceed with the matter.
The presiding magistrate noted that there was proof of service but said the matter would be adjourned due to the number of fresh cases before the court.
The court ordered that the defendants be served with hearing notices.
The case was adjourned to 2 November 2026 at 12:30 p.m.
About The Author
