By Bakary Ceesay
Recent remarks by Information Minister Dr. Ismaila Ceesay targeting Madi Jobarteh and the Edward Francis Small Centre for Rights and Justice have raised serious concerns about the state of democratic discourse in The Gambia. By questioning the legitimacy of the Centre and its founder, the Minister appears to be prioritizing form over substance, casting doubt on the contributions of critical civic voices rather than engaging with the issues they raise.
Civic engagement cannot be measured solely by the size of an office, the number of staff, or the resources at one’s disposal. History—and indeed, the very story of The Gambia’s democratic struggle—reminds us that individual citizens and small initiatives often drive accountability, transparency, and human rights advocacy. To delegitimize these efforts is to undermine the very foundations of participatory democracy.
Since its establishment in October 2024, the Edward Francis Small Centre for Rights and Justice has played an important role in stimulating debate on governance, the rule of law, and public accountability. Its founder, Madi Jobarteh, brings over three decades of experience in civil society, human rights, and governance. His work has never been about personal gain, but about ensuring that democratic governance is inclusive, transparent, and accountable to the people.
It is essential to remember that constitutional freedoms—expression, association, and participation—belong to all citizens, not just to institutions that are formally registered or heavily resourced. Efforts to reduce civic action to bureaucratic benchmarks risk shrinking public space, sending a dangerous message that only well-funded organizations may hold power to account.
The criticisms raised by Jobarteh focus squarely on matters of public interest: transparency, use of public resources, and adherence to due process. These are legitimate concerns that deserve substantive engagement, not attempts to discredit the messenger. Democratic governance is strengthened when critique is met with openness and facts, not delegitimization.
The Gambia’s democracy was built by courageous individuals long before formal institutions were fully in place. Recognizing and respecting diverse forms of civic engagement is not optional—it is central to sustaining a vibrant and accountable society.
It is time for government officials to engage constructively with accountability actors, focus on the substance of governance concerns, and reaffirm the space for civic action. Anything less risks weakening the very democracy that Gambians fought to build.